Pedestrians and cyclists are due to be placed at the top of a re-ordered pecking order, as a new Highway Code hierarchy rule is on the cards.
If approved in Parliament once MPs return from their summer holidays, the new rule will look at protecting the most vulnerable road users by giving them the most right of way, with the new hierarchy reflecting how much potential danger a motorist will pose to other road users – placing the heaviest vehicles at the bottom with the most responsibility.
On the change, a statement from the Department for Transport reads: ‘Car drivers will be responsible for ensuring cyclists are safe, while cyclists will be responsible for looking out for pedestrians,’ adding that this ‘does not remove the need for all road users to behave responsibly.’
Enjoy more MSL reading in the monthly magazine.
Click here to subscribe & save.
Also noted in the revised Highway Code is improving guidance on how much space road users must give cyclists when overtaking, and stresses that cyclists travelling straight ahead will have priority over other road users at junctions.
One point of contention is the current Rule 66 – referring to cyclists not riding two abreast – which will have to be cleared up if cyclists are given increased priority on the roads and on passing.
Pedestrians do currently have the priority when at a junction if they have started to cross, as per Rule 170, but this reshuffling would see pedestrians have more protection on pavements and when waiting to cross a road (or crossing at any place). This is seemingly a much more European approach, where motorists will need to look out for pedestrians at all times, and cede their progress in favour of someone above them in the hierarchy.
On getting a potential change to the Highway Code communicated to current road users, Transport planner Mark Strong says: “We know most drivers don’t read the Highway Code after they pass their tests. “Unless the Government sends information to all driving license holders and carries out a national PR campaign to reach other people, it is unlikely that there will be the desired effect.”
To reiterate, this rule is not in place just yet, as it will need to be approved by Parliament first, but it seems likely that this will come into force, particularly shaping the future of ramifications when a pedestrian or cyclist is involved in a collision with a vehicle.